Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

This was an interesting symbol to choose for an internet explanation. It took me a while to realise that the rectangle is actually the symbol that I'm supposed to see, rather than a missing glyph.



It's not exactly a rectangle though, the two downward strokes extend slightly past the bottom horizontal stroke.


In handwriting, or calligraphy, it might be rendered like this, in fact:

       2
      --------+
  1 \        /
     \ ---- /
        3
The three strokes not all connected, and the left and right sides tapering downward a bit (exaggerated in the ASCII above).

Image search for "kuchi-no kanji + shodou (calligraphy)":

https://www.google.com/search?q=%E5%8F%A3%E3%81%AE%E6%BC%A2%...

It seems there are two schools on the relationship between stroke 2 or 3: 2 can extend downward past 3, or 3 can underscore 2.


Wikipedia has stoke order animations for radicals.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/口


Not on my screen (http://i.imgur.com/korTPAQ.png)

Maybe it is a missing character after all :) (Oh no, I've been fooled by chrome/freetype/something!)


I see, it is indeed showing a missing character symbol on your computer. The actual character is much more square than that, in addition to the strokes I mentioned. (http://i.imgur.com/s6bW7u0.png)


Yep, that's the missing character glyph - known colloquially as "tofu".


Yes, it is.


It has the added bonus of being almost correct even if the symbol is missing.


Clever.


I agree. And I'm an Australian in Japan learning Japanese.

(I was expecting it to be a rant about insufficient unicode usage.)


Doesn't help that at least for me it gets rendered differently in the title on HN and the actual article.

That said, I expected something Japanese related, given that it's Candy Japan, but you'd think common fonts would have different looking characters for “no glyph” and the kanji for mouth.


Another problem is that if the character appears in isolation, it's hard to tell whether you are looking at 口 (mouth) or 囗 (the "box radical" kanji, or "kunigamae").

Ha, for me, they look quite different in the font used for editing, but not so much in the rendered comment other than a small difference in size.


That rectangle denoting a missing glyph is called "tofu" because it looks like it, so there is a connection to Japanese anyway.

It's not clear whether or not that naming for that character originated in Japan.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: