>It's dangerous at its intended purpose, making it worse-than-useless.
You can't authoritatively say this until you have done a thorough cost analysis.
Tens or hundreds of millions of people around the world own these sort of brushes and they're very useful and effective for cleaning. I would not be surprised if their utility exceeded the cost of a few GI injuries a year. To be clear, I wouldn't be surprised the other way either.
You can't authoritatively say this until you have done a thorough cost analysis.
Tens or hundreds of millions of people around the world own these sort of brushes and they're very useful and effective for cleaning. I would not be surprised if their utility exceeded the cost of a few GI injuries a year. To be clear, I wouldn't be surprised the other way either.