Yeah I hate 'performant'. It's used as a sloppy synonym for "high performance". It's like calling a high voltage circuit box "voltant". Which to me implies just that it "has a voltage" But you can only have a voltage relative to some other level of charge somewhere else. Volts are an interval between charges, everything has a voltage (), so everything is "voltant".
Performance is the same. Everything performs, you can only talk about higher or lower performance of one system relative to another. Just calling something "performant" implies that it is "high performance", but leaves out what it's performing better than.
I hate that word. lol
( except not: everything has a charge; we assume some zero level charge and we can say that everything has a voltage relative to that level. That's why there are two words: charge and voltage.)
Performance is the same. Everything performs, you can only talk about higher or lower performance of one system relative to another. Just calling something "performant" implies that it is "high performance", but leaves out what it's performing better than.
I hate that word. lol
( except not: everything has a charge; we assume some zero level charge and we can say that everything has a voltage relative to that level. That's why there are two words: charge and voltage.)