Very nice. It'd be cool to see the same approach taken with a Python or Haskell ...

on April 17, 2010

[deleted]

cgranade · on April 17, 2010

Not if it's a generic webpage that is viewed in Safari. If I'm not terribly much mistaken, that's the whole point of this project-- it gets around 3.1.1 by using offline support in Safari. After all, Processing.js is not technically pure JavaScript, and so it would fall subject to 3.1.1 were it not for this method.

blasdel · on April 18, 2010

Apple only starts to care what you do with javascript in a webkit view if you poke holes in it to expose Cocoa APIs, like PhoneGap does.

They would not view a language implemented in Javascript using the normal DOM APIs as anything other than just Javascript.

peregrine · on April 18, 2010

Are those available? I've only seen Basic and Scheme/Lisp interpreters so far. But I'd be more interested in a Clojure, ruby, or python version.