Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I suppose the difference is that I don't expect my television to run on batteries, but I do expect it to work on wifi.



Why? TVs aren't very portable, carrying content over a wire makes much more sense.


It's easier for most consumers to just put their new TV where they want rather than knock a bunch of holes in the wall (or ask their landlord to do the work)


Right, and you accept a degraded experience for the portability. The speaker built into your phone isn't as good as stand-up speakers either.


It's even easier to put their new TV where the wire is.


I have a partner who hates wires. Wifi is a very normal thing for TV's, Games consoles, Chromecasts... etc;


The question rather is: What would you rather be willing to give up: Ethernet or your partner? :-)

(a smart girl knows that it is a bad idea to urge nerds to make a choice between her and his PC).


Casual sexism is casual.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: