Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Bear Stearns current losses from the sub-prime investments are $3.2bn but GM's losses were reported as 39bn sometime last year. Why is the Bear Stearns saga so significant?

Edit: I didn't understand the whole problem behind Bear Stearns but this Q&A from BBC details the issue really well (would still appreciate some insight or further reading links though): http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7296827.stm




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: