Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Jobs could, conceivably, call the NYT and tell them they are full of sh*t and refer them directly to the makers of the application.



Sure, but at that point Apple could be held liable for knowingly selling the app (and why you assume Jobs is personally handling this, I have no idea). This is the way almost every content company works: when they receive a takedown notice, they comply. Whatever money Apple is making from the sales of the app pales in comparison to the amount of money the Times' lawyers could wring out of them. If this kind of thing became a problem that was significantly affecting the platform, they may need to step in, but for one-off cases they're not going to.

They're a publicly-traded business; they don't run on fairy dust and unicorn tears.


> and why you assume Jobs is personally handling this, I have no idea

By now, he certainly is.

It would be nice if Apple stood by the developers that make the iPhone/iPod/iPad ecosystem what it is.


Apple doesn't even treat its developers well itself. Why would Apple go out of its way to stop other people from mistreating them?


I said it would be nice. I didn't say I expected them to.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: