> I'm not against personally prosecuting those in charge, but it's often extremely difficult to prove that specific individuals are responsible.
But isn't that the whole reason CEO's get paid so much, because they carry so much responsibility ? Most corporations have a clear chain of command, should be quite easy to figure out who is responsible (which can be separate from who actually committed the crime).
No, but they use it as a justification for their ridiculous salaries so I’d say we take them up on it and hold them personally responsible for their company’s crimes.
But isn't that the whole reason CEO's get paid so much, because they carry so much responsibility ? Most corporations have a clear chain of command, should be quite easy to figure out who is responsible (which can be separate from who actually committed the crime).