> Once you're comfortable with the destructive commands, you could even drop the temporary branch and rely just on reflog for the undo. But I understand how this could be easier at the beginning.
Ideally, we'd make each of these "feature" branches as short and straightforward as possible but then we are out of git territory and into some kind of project management territory?
The one thing I don't like about destructive commands is that once you publish to a branch that others are working on, you should rarely* use them.
* I'd say never but I usually don't like talking in absolutes.
Ideally, we'd make each of these "feature" branches as short and straightforward as possible but then we are out of git territory and into some kind of project management territory?
The one thing I don't like about destructive commands is that once you publish to a branch that others are working on, you should rarely* use them.
* I'd say never but I usually don't like talking in absolutes.