A better article title then would not have been "Bitcoin is more expensive to keep safe than gold" (which is untrue). It would have been something like "High management fees in Bitcoin funds caused by lack of competition in newly emerging marketplace".
The former is more to the point and accurate enough. I think all of us in tech knew what the article was going to be about before we read it.
The problem is real though. We must reckon with the possibility that all these anarcho-capitalist dreams will go to hell once the necessary minimum overhead of handling crypto turns it into an _even more centralized_ medium of exchange.
No, all of us in tech certainly did not deduce the correct meaning from the inaccurate article title and contents. If that were true my comment explaining the inaccuracy of the title would not be voted to #1.
