Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

One of the interviewees did speak (though he's not apple or amazon), and said that Bloomberg completely misrepresented what he said to support this theory, which he totally disagrees with: https://9to5mac.com/2018/10/09/bloomberg/



The article you linked states, Bloomberg says:

> Joe FitzPatrick was not one of these 17 individual primary sources that included company insiders and government officials,


Oh, he was one of the named sources. Good catch, though that doesn't change the point.


The entire story is an elaboration of a hypothetical example Fitzpatrick gave in consultation. That the final article is an exact match is seriously problematic.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: