As is our attitude of Mozilla's criticism of other browsers and practices, it's only rational for us to read and understand this author's views with an open mind.
Invalid ones can be dismissed, but any valid criticism only helps towards progress.
It's not worth my time. Signal-to-noise ratio is too poor. The guy can go talk out his anger issues with a therapist, and when he's done, if he wants to write out a succinct post that compares Mozilla's issues with those of the other browser vendors, I'll be the first in line to read it. I will be very surprised if they turn out to be the worst of the lot.
Invalid ones can be dismissed, but any valid criticism only helps towards progress.