Dislikes: logo, and when you scrape a new website there's no visual or other feedback about the scraping process so there's a temptation to just reload the page.
Suggestions: animate folding so navigation focus isn't lost. Offer alternative tree view schemas that reflect node degree size.
But overall, great. I want to use it all the time for everything; this is how the browser inspector should work, instead of being locked into a text paradigm that requires the user to read everything.
RequestMap does the same but also categorizes domains by type (eg: advertiser, analytics), and uses a coloured force-directed graph. http://requestmap.webperf.tools/
RequestMap does all of this, even more. Why reinventing the wheel?
I really appreciate what CIRCL does for the infosec world with MISP but they should focus on fixing all the issues with MISP and AIL (especially AIL) and cleaning their code, instead of starting a project for a need that is already filled by multiple solutions.
Dislikes: logo, and when you scrape a new website there's no visual or other feedback about the scraping process so there's a temptation to just reload the page.
Suggestions: animate folding so navigation focus isn't lost. Offer alternative tree view schemas that reflect node degree size.
But overall, great. I want to use it all the time for everything; this is how the browser inspector should work, instead of being locked into a text paradigm that requires the user to read everything.