Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Only if you admit in the review that you took no action whatsoever to allow them to fix whatever the issue was.



If you research that time period you will find many arbitrary rejections were being made that could not be resolved by the developer and may even have been nonsensical.

https://www.businessinsider.com/iphone-app-rejections-2009-1...

https://www.cnet.com/news/behind-10-eyebrow-raising-app-stor...

https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/a3dwq8/apples-long-histor...


Read your own articles. None of the decisions were overturned as a result of a report to the media. All of them were resolved independently between Apple and the developer.


Google Voice and the NiN album were both reinstated without change after succumbing to public pressure. Google actually went to the FTC where Apple claimed they didn't reject their app! The drone strike notification app in the Vice article ended up being approved in 2017(!!) after five years of trying to publish it, then it got immediately removed lol.

https://www.macworld.com/article/1140476/accessapproved.html

https://apple.slashdot.org/story/10/11/16/2318247/official-g...

https://mashable.com/2017/03/28/apple-app-store-metadata-dro...

Also from the CNET article: a political countdown timer, a podcasting app and South Park streaming episodes app were all never approved.


None of those articles cite the reason for the change as being media backlash, though. If that was the case, then why would Apple wait days in some cases, weeks in others, and years (according to you) for still others.

It's always resolved through either a change by the developer or a change in the review policy at Apple. Again, the statement is about the relationship between the developer and Apple. If anything, Apple will be less likely to cave or change a decision just because of media pressure. Otherwise, the countdown timer, podcast app, and South Park would have just been approved after the media got wind of it. You're literally arguing against yourself with that point.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: