Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I've heard it mentioned on HN that big companies use mass layoffs in bad times to cut a lot of people that the don't want but can't fire. Unless a whole department gets axed, the valuable employees are usually retained.



> > Bad candidates are more likely to laid off,

> ... mass layoffs ... cut a lot of people that the don't want ... the valuable employees are usually retained.

There's a huge difference between, "was not sufficiently valuable for prior company's developing needs," versus, "is a bad candidate."

This reminds me of the superior/inferior bias that people try to put onto evolution. "Suboptimal for its niche," does not mean, "inferior."




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: