Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
jayd16
on April 12, 2020
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
California Supreme Court: Transaction is not requi...
You would need to show intent either way. If the intent is proven to discriminate based one of several owners I think the protection would still apply.
ineedasername
on April 13, 2020
[–]
Under "disparate impact" [0], intent is not required.
[0]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disparate_impact
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search:
