Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

To recap, I claimed:

> You can always construct a credible argument for how any statement is "encouraging sentiment that does lead to real world violence and other harms"

People disagreed, so I gave these examples.




And I’m wondering what your response to those examples would be.


I think that an counterargument that can be made against any argument obviously proves too much and has to be ignored.

The alternative is that we accept that all arguments cause murder and must be banned.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proving_too_much




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: