I am far from shitting on GIMP. But truth to be told, it's not very pleasant user experience. And I feel like there are several fairly affordable and significantly better commercial alternatives to Photoshop.
The Gimp is dire software and needs taking out and shooting. It's one of those awful apps that people who know nothing about digital design always trot out whenever others bemoan the lack of Photoshop on Linux. A recommendation that does more harm than good, as anyone who's used Photoshop and gives The Gimp a spin will end up thinking "If that's the best Linux has to offer, Linux must be rubbish!"
Ever since they started offering the Windows version as well I've been using Affinity Photon exclusively. I'm not doing a whole lot of photo editing, but when I do, I don't want to bother with the awful user experience that GIMP provides. I'll gladly pay 50€ for a software like Affinity Photo that offers almost the same features as PS while also being able to work with a lot of Photoshop file formats
What else is interesting is that if you are willing to migrate to a tablet based workflow then you can get tools very, very close to par with the Adobe suite for less than $100 - and that's a one time buy, not a subscription. If you're not married to open source, of course.
Spend another hundred or so on an Apple pencil and some font licenses and you are flying.
yeah well that is basically my point. We can all keep paying Adobe or someone else or make sure GIMP has at least one person working on it full time and have legitimate chance of not needing Photoshop in the future.
Same here. I've been using PS since version 4.0 and it has become an absolutely bloated nightmare. +the cloud, vendor lock-in, pricing and all that stuff.
>We can all keep paying Adobe or someone else or make sure GIMP has at least one person working on it full time and have legitimate chance of not needing Photoshop in the future.
FOSS is a free market. The mere fact that GIMP isn't meeting users' needs is supposed to result in competing, superior forks driving it out of business, not a desire to give more money to the incumbent.
Don't know why people hating on GIMP.. maybe it's not exact replacement for photoshop.. but I've used it for product photo touch-up work and it gets the job done. Which is great job for free
I agree. It's a good tool and gets the job done, and it's been a tool that I've reached for a long time.
It's unfortunate that their funding situation is so dire. It's a project that could use a cash injection like Blender got. Blender went from having a terrible UI to winning awards.
I agree, for me it is hard to understand reasons behind it's state - level of stubbornness is almost irrational, it's like project maintainers took some kind of secret oath to never ever surrender and bow to those pesky users demands.
I find it odd that a technology I could easily reproduce myself brings in so much money compared to a project that is so incredibly far beyond my capabilities.
Be kind. Don't be snarky. Have curious conversation; don't cross-examine. Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive.
Please don't post shallow dismissals, especially of other people's work. A good critical comment teaches us something.