Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

They haven't made up a new standard. The standard already exists. The "via" is just a way of visualizing this standard.

Just because the "via" UI element doesn't appear in any RFC doesn't mean it doesn't represent something that does appear in an RFC.




It needs to say something like Reply To MUST match From, if not the email client MUST display a visual representation

I don't see that kind of thing in an RFC anywhere though?


I think the "problem" shown in this article is when Gmail shows the "via" text when the From ___domain is different to the signature header.

It's very common to have From addresses different to Reply To; a contact form for example should do this.


DMARC RFC says something along those lines (Identifier Alignment).

With DKIM anyone can sign the email, its up to the verifier to decide who to trust and how to represent that. DMARC formalises who you should trust (i.e. the ___domain key for the sender).

p.s. It seems you can click on the "via" in gmail and it gives you some (rubbish and borderline misleading) information.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: