Am I supposed to come away thinking they're both reasonable interpretations which accurately critique the main argument in this article? Because that's what I came away with.
(At the moment, the other to comment is about how focusing on positive goals is a good business strategy, not just light-stepping on legal egg shells.)
Can you explain what you’re trying to say? I feel like I’m supposed to see something damning in these two paragraphs, but I’m not seeing it. Writing styles seem dissimilar enough that I don’t think they’re the same person, if that’s it.
