Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Yes, they use the money in order to maintain the house. Furthermore owner-occupancy is a thing, where the landlord does some maintenance themselves.

However no matter what, no landlord can maintain all aspects of the house alone. You think a single person can be a master of all trades and have all equipment on hand all of the time in an apartment, for instance?

Why does it even matter if someone pays others to maintain the house? Do you think there are people who build modern houses alone with no machinery?




I believe the argument would be that the tenant might be empowered to pay for their own maintenance if they're not paying rent to a landlord.


Can’t said tenant just buy a house then?


Because homes are overpriced, because they're treated as capital instead of a durable good & because all financial / building policy advantages existing homeowners


Ok, so if you can’t or don’t want to buy you rent. No one is entitled anything. Or you can move to a less desirable area that’s cheaper.

Overpriced or not, people still buy.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: