I agree with your side. Here’s my take. For some people, there’s a line you don’t cross. However, if the line is going to be crossed anyway, why not cross it in the best way possible? I’m inclined to believe that if done well, even those against it being done will end up finding appreciation for the next works.
This whole situation happened with Robert Jordan and The Wheel of Time series. It was considered a mess by fans but was a critical success.
Either way at least we got an ending. Thing is- the books had been meandering for a while, and it's quite possible Jordan would have whiffed at the end, but we will never know.
With Tolkien it's just been a shallow money grab since The Hobbit trilogy made off a super short book and after the Amazon series stuff I'm over it anyway.
It feels like at this point they should have people write universe books like Forgotten Realms or something. New books by new authors in the Tolkienverse.
ASOIAF will probably never be finished, and I'm OK with that.
I used to hate not getting to see how a story ends but after so many books/shows/series/movies always ending on cliffhangers to never be completed, I'm just over it.
Seems even storytellers die heroes or live long enough to become villains ;)
> Wheel of Time ... was considered a mess by fans but was a critical success.
Can you go into why it was considered a mess? I'm a relatively recent finisher of the series so I can't speak to the contemporary reaction of the fanbase, but my impression has been that the current community is, at a minimum, satisfied with Sanderson's work. There are several things that people complain frequently about (and that I agree with) like Mat's character development and the Androl arc. Not to mention the lost possibility of follow-on series after A Memory of Light! That doesn't mean people think it's a mess, though.
It's just what I remember from release. We'd waited so long. I haven't even read it since. Checked reviews and it's sitting at 4.5. I will have to reread the series anyways, maybe it was just some of us never being satisfied, I know I've been that guy before.
I personally was glad for the ending. My main critique was with the series as a whole meandering wildly. But was still something I loved.
I believe they had lots of notes and a roadmap from Jordan as well, but I could be mis-remembering.
One weird series that had an ending that wasn't supposed to was the Gunslinger series. I think King went like 20 years between books before ending it. I really remember it because he had a note when you got to the ending saying he didn't feel the story should have an ending, and he recommended stopping there, but for those who needed an ending he provided one to give some closure.
I thought that was so cool, and read it, but prefer to think Roland is still out there somewhere chasing some new Walter, so rather than preferring an ending that time I preferred open-ended, which almost never happens.
In spite of something I wrote elsewhere--basically that sometimes it's just time to move on--I tend to agree. While it may be blasphemous to say, much as I love it, LoTR is not without its flaws--especially the whole structure of The Return of the King. Tolkien was a world building (and linguistic) genius but LoTR hasx its flaws.
