Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

>Because if Coinbase did that, nobody would use them, but people do use Ethereum.

And that doesn't feel anything like a ponzi scheme to you? Because, again, as you state, people are not using Ethereum (that would require paying fees to old investors) they are buying it (in hopes that they aren't too late to become an old investor themselves).

Or are you literally saying that the value of ETH is that "Aesthetically, it's nicer to see 'ETH' at the end of an account balance than it is to see 'USD'"?




What? No that's not what I said at all.

People are using Ethereum, they are paying transaction fees to use it. Those fees mostly do not go to stakers, they are mostly burned. Even if that weren't the case, it's not even close to a ponzi because the stakers aren't paid out by future stakers, they are paid out by diluting everyone and via fees for usage.

Also to address your second point, I'm not saying that, but that would not make it a ponzi at all. Art has this property, art isn't a ponzi.


> People are using Ethereum, they are paying transaction fees to use it. Those fees mostly do not go to stakers

Why exactly are people staking then? How are they being rewarded for slashing risk? Who do you think gets the gas fees? You know ETH2 still has them, right?

> the stakers aren't paid out by future stakers, they are paid out by diluting everyone and via fees for usage.

Again, you’re absolutely misinformed here, but aren’t crypto maximalists supposed to be all about how bad inflation in fiat is? Or is that old news?

> Also to address your second point, I'm not saying that, but that would not make it a ponzi at all. Art has this property, art isn't a ponzi.

You’re the one who said “most ethereal is bought on centralized exchanges”! You can’t have it both ways.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: