> Honestly, I think someone needs to ridicule the ridiculous.
Imagine thinking that Galileo was pushing a remotely modern model of planetary motion when the Copernican model still had crystal spheres and perfect circles due to lack of several centuries of research into matters like gravity.
There where easily observable flaws on both sides of the argument.
Imagine thinking that Galileo was pushing a remotely modern model of planetary motion when the Copernican model still had crystal spheres and perfect circles due to lack of several centuries of research into matters like gravity.
There where easily observable flaws on both sides of the argument.