Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

If Elizabeth Holmes is going to jail then SBF probably is too.



Yes. What the performatively cynical crowd is missing is that SBF, like Elizabeth Holmes, stole from the rich.

Even for people who believe that everything is 100% corrupt 100% of the time in the American justice system, SBF going to jail should be seen as confirmation of that bias.


I believe SBF stated in a recent video that it might be possible for US clients to be “made whole” (indirectly stating everyone else will be fucked). So if he manages to return funds to US investors, would he still be likely to be prosecuted?


Everything is probabalistic. That would reduce the odds by reducing the number of powerful people putting pressure on prosecutors. But plenty of rich and powerful non-US people have influence in the US.

And stealing from the rich isn't the only factor at play here. Even if all of the money was returned to everyone, there are plenty of rich/powerful people and institutions who dislike crypto for various legit and corrupt reasons, so there would still be some pressure to prosecute.

IMO he's fucked, even aside from the stealing from the rich angle. It's just too high profile and too embarrassing to too many regulatory agencies. He's well into "make an example of" territory.


Isn't that what Shkreli tried in his defense, that none of his investors actually lost money? It didn't help him either


SBF also stated that he just needed to raise $8B and everything would be okay. I'm not sure if he's delusional or lying, or some combination of the two, but I think we're past the point where we should believe much of what he says.


I mean if you give me $8B, I assure you everything will be ok.


Don't listen to my sibling poster, I can assure you everything will be OK for $7B!


Look, we can race to the bottom or we can split $7.5B two ways.


Even if we take him at face value here (which we probably shouldn't) it isn't just money, he also made the rich people look like idiots. So retribution feels inevitable.


Many Madoff investors were compensated... doesn't change the fact that he committed fraud.


Madoff had ‘borrowed from Peter to pay Paul’ and the victims were rich enough that they didn’t really spend the money so it was possible in the end to shuffle almost all of it back to its rightful owners.


“performatively cynical” is such a fantastic way of describing that kind of discourse


Bernie Madoff got sentenced to >100 years. That feels like a pretty close comp to me.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernie_Madoff


[flagged]


She very much did have an association with the Clintons: https://www.vox.com/2016/3/14/11586966/theranos-ceo-elizabet...


Don't be too cynical, she was the crown jewel of the "Presidential Ambassadors for Global Entrepreneurship" for the Obama admin.


She had similarly connected political board members: https://news.crunchbase.com/health-wellness-biotech/theranos...

Henry Kissinger (former United States Secretary of State);

Jim Mattis (retired Marine Corps four-star general);

George Shultz (former United States Secretary of State);

Richard Kovacevich (former CEO of Wells Fargo);

William Perry (former United States Secretary of Defense);

William Foege (former director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).

She is like a little FTX in that sense.

But I don't believe the Clintons' are uniquely corrupt, rather just as corrupt as similarly powerful US politicians. I am not a believer if QAnon conspiracies.


It’s always a good thing when someone screws over Kissinger. She should get a pardon just for that.


She had connected investors who felt defrauded. That increased the odds of her getting convicted. If they thought there was still a chance of getting value out the odds would probably lean the other way.


I think if the system were as corrupt as you guys say, Holmes would have committed suicide or suffered some debilitating accident or something. Going to jail for just a few years doesn't feel like much of a dose of vengeance


That’s an escalation ad absurdism of what my actual opinion is about outcomes.


I don't share GP's cynicism, but I think the argument would be that none of those people are "similarly powerful" to the Clintons.


How Henry Kissinger's stock has fallen it seems...


He's still got nicer legs than Hitler, and bigger tits than Cher.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T5vo7jLGOb8


Put "-Dynasty" after all of them, and the only one that fits and has common use is "Clinton Dynasty"


If you're still hearing "Clinton Dynasty" these days, you're in a serious filter bubble.


The reach of the QAnon fantasies is pretty far reaching these days, even Hacker News isn't immune unfortunately.


She actually does. Check your facts.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2025 batch! Applications are open till May 13

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: