Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Trust is not transitive. My friends reshare all sort of crazy memes, and their friends are even worse.

Just because you know someone doesn't mean they're good at reading the news or understanding what's going on in the world.




I think trust is somewhat transitive, but it's not ___domain independent.

I have friends whose movie recommendations I trust but whose restaurant recommendations I don't, and vice versa. I have friend that I trust to be witty but not wise and others the opposite.

A system that tried to model trust would probably need to support tagging people with what kinds of things you trust them in.


This. Nobody is 100% trustworthy in every circumstance. When I say I trust someone, what I mean is that I have a good handle on what sorts of things that person can be trusted about, and what sorts of things they can't.


Exactly - you have a reasonable model of a person. So it also includes things like a recommendations giving you the _opposite_ of the purported opinion. Or trusting the details are technically true, but missing the forest for the trees. Or any other contextual interpretation of the data.


I'm sure everyone says that about themselves. It doesn't work out like that though.


I know many people I like very much… but would never trust their judgment.


On second thought, I'm not even sure what "transitive" means here. It seems like it should mean that if you trust your friend's movie recommendations then you trust your friend's friends' movie recommendations? Or maybe something like:

   trustsMovieRecs(A, B) and trustsMovieRecs(B, C) => trustsMovieRecs(A, C).
Their movie recommendations are likely some function that takes their friends' movie recommendations as input (along with watching them), but that's more like an indirect dependency than a transitive closure.


Trust decays exponentially with distance in the social graph, but it does not immediately fall to zero. People who you second-degree trust are more likely to be trustable than a random person, and then via that process of discovery you can choose to trust that person directly.


For the limited purpose of finding interesting people to follow it can be okay, but I don't see it getting automated in a way that would work for web search or finding people with a common interest. For example, Reddit often works better because you're looking for something that can't be found by asking people you know. The people are out there but you're not connected.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2025 batch! Applications are open till May 13

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: