It strikes me as a reasonable compromise. It seems pg was paying attention to the recent poll, where quite a few HN readers expressed support for HN joining in the blackout, but where there were some good arguments for not blacking out HN today. By just blacking out the logo, it provides a stark reminder of the situation to any HN readers who needed reminding, but it doesn't take the site completely offline. Makes sense, since there were some good arguments that taking a niche site like HN offline wouldn't do much good anyway.

I dunno, I'm guessing pg just decided to go for a pragmatic, but still principled, stand. <shrug />

Even though probably everyone who frequents HN is already aware of SOPA/PIPA, I think it's more a show of solidarity with others participating (Wiki/Google) and a "lead by example" case rather than the idea that it might make a huge difference in the same way that some of these bigger players will.

Is there a link to more info somewhere? Maybe a small link on the right of the top header? At the moment it seems a bit 'in' to just blackout without an obvious link to more info.