I feel like lost in this conversation is that ChatGPT is incredibly good at writing English. It basically never makes grammatical mistakes, it doesn't spew gibberish, and for the most part has extremely well-structured replies. The replies might be bullshit or hallucinations, but it's not gibberish.
It's kind of breathtaking that we forgot about that being hard.
The goalposts are moving again.
BTW, it has passed many standardized tests under the same circumstances as a human.
Some of the replies are gibberish, especially once you get into technical subjects that it has very little training data on. It kitbashes words together that actually mean nothing, which is no surprise given that it's an LLM.
> BTW, it has passed many standardized tests under the same circumstances as a human.
No, it hasn’t, and it is physically impossible for it to. The extent to which the differences are material may be debatable, but this claim is simply false.
It would be a useful contribution to explain what you think the material differences are, rather than referencing them through innuendo, as if anyone knows what you mean.
It's kind of breathtaking that we forgot about that being hard.
The goalposts are moving again.
BTW, it has passed many standardized tests under the same circumstances as a human.