You see, you are also making excuses about a potential outcome that maybe might happen, “because of others”.
Of course your hands are tied, you have no choice. If everyone is doing it, then you have to do it.
Come on, just admit you are making your own decision. Stop redirecting accountability.
If you replace people with AI, you will be consciously and lazily doing it on your own.
If that’s the only solution you can come up with, then do you really have the ability, creativity and energy to lead a business? Or will you always take the easy way out?
If you are always doing what everyone else is doing, and following, then do you think you have any advantage over anyone else?
I think your statements are great and I would love if the world would work the way you are trying to convey. But it doesn't.
I pointed out that the outcome of whether AI will replace human labor is not in the hands of individuals, or at least only in a trivial manner. If you are running a car factory today, do you honestly believe it should not use robots? And do you seriously think that the CEO of such a company can just single-handedly decide to ignore the massive efficiency gains that automation provides? It is no different if your product is copywriting, software or whatever other process AI will inevitably transform. Appealing to the individual good will of middle managers or even executives simply cannot stop it.
Of course your hands are tied, you have no choice. If everyone is doing it, then you have to do it.
Come on, just admit you are making your own decision. Stop redirecting accountability.
If you replace people with AI, you will be consciously and lazily doing it on your own.
If that’s the only solution you can come up with, then do you really have the ability, creativity and energy to lead a business? Or will you always take the easy way out?
If you are always doing what everyone else is doing, and following, then do you think you have any advantage over anyone else?