Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

It's not the same thing, Hola was found to use clients as exit nodes, which is definitely an abuse of client trust, resources, and potentially exposing them to major legal trouble or otherwise, but I don't think that can be considered a botnet, whereas the VPN app in question here is pulling lists of URLs from control sites and then directly sending requests to them, so it operates in the C&C fashion of a botnet.



> Hola was found to use clients as exit nodes

Hola is ran by luminati/bright data which absolutely are pure scum scam botnet-enabling shitbag company.


Yes, but it is a different type of scum. We need to correctly categorise the scum or it’ll be chaos!


At the end of day that's what matters.


I couldn’t disagree more. Scum is scum. The people who can discern the difference are few and far between, and we shouldn’t muddy the waters between different types of scum for the already-overwhelmed layperson.

Most people exclusively care about scum vs. not scum, and all but vuln-dev level sources shouldn’t distinguish.

Maybe HN fell on the savvy side of this at one point, but it was so long ago…


This kind of muddy thinking has hurt a LOT of people.

Nuance matters! While the guy who makes sexist jokes and the guy who will rape you if ever alone with you are both scum, that difference really really matters.


I appreciate the specificity, especially on a forum of tech-inclined users and collapsible comments.


If you’re “tech-inclined” enough to understand the difference, how does it alter your behavior?


I appreciated the distinction to help form my own opinion. I believe there are varying degrees of scummy-ness and appreciate someone not trying to "decide for me"


I feel like your “teach the controversy” response just reinforces my point.


Who hurt you? I can't believe that "Nuance is unacceptable" is the position you really want to go with.


[flagged]


Because we're actually quite bad at understanding people's motives (e.g. fundamental attribution error). Not to mention the various ways information gets biased as it flows through people and institutions.


I don't follow the logic.

I will note your posts are reading as activism/consensus building, which gets people removed from hackernews. So you might want to dial it down.


You mean "scums up" the waters, no?




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: