What is the point of a title that implies something sinister when there’s, functionally speaking, no such thing as an EULA that isn’t “imposed” and “freedom-restricting”?

At first blush there’s nothing obviously Draconian or pernicious about these changes… the overall EULA is certainly not a Libertarian’s wet dream, but then I’m not sure a game aimed at children is really the place to be experimenting with myopic political fantasies.