So there's an infinite pyramid of "who learned what from who", and payment flows upwards along the hierarchy, all the way back to people who are long dead, and then down to their descendants who presumably inherited their "knowledge rights"?
You can't be serious. Thank god our world doesn't work like that.
It's not about who learned what from whom, it's about superstar economy.
If you serve all customers and leave nothing for the rest, it will be a problem.
What do you think why writers and actors have included AI in the reasons of their strike?
The fun part about being a strong believer of AI and actually understanding its capacities is being able to tell when people are completely blinded by hype.
AI will not make writers “obsolete”, that is utterly absurd. Would you say reality TV made tv writers obsolete? No? Oh well.
You get what you pay for. That includes what you pay for as a producer…
> AI will not make writers “obsolete”, that is utterly absurd.
Of course. And those so-called "computers" won't make human calculators obsolete. After all, they are as large as an entire room, and by the time they are ready to receive input, a human with his slide rule has already computed three and a half entire logarithms!
Human creative professions have 5-10 years left, if they are very lucky.
> Human creative professions have 5-10 years left, if they are very lucky.
So in that sense do developers have ~2 years left? Code is much more rigid than acting or creative writing and AI seems to be getting there first. I mean if the all-powerful AI can make modern movies than clearly it can handle writing all code right?
You can't be serious. Thank god our world doesn't work like that.