Just to note, warrenbuffett.com is not an official Warren Buffett site. The front page does say this - but this article does not. This doesn't detract from the article's quality - just the provenance of this copy.
EDIT: Must say I'm not really sure why I was downmodded; this is an excellent book (a classic really) that provides advice from 'actual rich people'. Maybe it's the get-rich-slowly aspect?
I haven't read this, but Nasim Taleb talks about it a lot in Fooled by Randomness. For example, Thomas Stanley, the book's author, states that risk taking is a common characteristic that rich people have. Nasim basically says "Yeah, sure, but what about the masses of people who are poor because of their risk taking?"
I recommend reading Fooled by Randomness first and then, if you're still interested, The Millionaire Next Door.
That's a good point. Lots of the factoids about rich people don't say anything about all the people who used those approaches. So, besides things like common sense and intuition, it is hard to get a statistically accurate idea about the correlation between the methods and their users' success.
When you get down to 0 or -1 often it's just assholes being arbitrary or pedantic. Don't worry about it. Asking why you were downmodded is a sure way to get dowmodded more though; it annoys people.
Only if you have a scientific mindset. Otherwise it might be just inspiring ;)
A lot of rich people didn't theorize much about how to get rich. They just followed their gut feeling about how to execute, and they did it with confidence. Maybe the confidence makes all the difference.
I think quite a lot of poor people also just followed their gut feeling about how to execute, and did it with confidence. But of course you don't get to hear so much from them, for obvious reasons.
How about this less scientific but more practical approach. Go ahead & listen to W Buffet, Cuban or anyone else because they made it.
You have a limited amount of listening you can do.
It's not obvious. Most of the people on this site, if they sold their website or whatever project for 100.000, will blow at least 20.000 on pointless stuff.
There is nothing wrong with blowing 20% of whatever you make on pointless stuff (though 10% would probably be more prudent), key is not blowing the other 80%.
I think it is pretty obvious; it's just not easy to restrain yourself from the temptation of getting a new toy, and it's too easy to rationalize why it's not necessary to save right now.
my boss always told me you can either save more or make more, and to ways treat those atleast as equals because the savings usually come with free time. I found this advice better than the 10 but that's probably cause I know my boss; I don't know warren