In terms of “airdroppability to disaster zones”, hardly anything beats cardboard beds[0].
It is true that the field hospital in TFA is a much comprehensive solution. I just wonder what an equivalent would be if designed with similar minimalistic principles to the cardboard bed.
I don't really get the point of this bed, how is it better than sleeping on the ground? The only reasons I can think of are insulation (which just a couple sheets of cardboard would do well, a 50% savings on material), and keeping away from pests like mice and cockroaches. Granted, those are decent reasons, but I wonder if spending the money elsewhere for disaster relief would be better. Am I missing something?
In addition to your reasons, and sibling's 'easier to get up', I'd add:
- does actually look much more comfortable than the ground to me. The middle would give a bit into the cavity of the base, it's not just a sheet on the ground as I imagined reading your comment.
- being raised makes it easier for medical personnel to attend to any injuries etc.
- looks like a more clearly delimited arrangement, I imagine it would more easily become difficult to walk around people sleeping on the floor, as they'd sprawl out, lose the organised grid arrangement, etc.
But I don't have any relevant experience to comment on how important any of that is, or if it's the best way to spend whatever cardboard beds cost in such a scenario.
Tbh those look like they might collapse if you don't sleep still on your back, without tossing and turning. It doesn't really seem like a great fit for disaster relief for people who are under severe stress. If I were assigned one of those beds I think I'd lay it flat on the floor just so I don't have to worry about falling in the middle of the night.
It is true that the field hospital in TFA is a much comprehensive solution. I just wonder what an equivalent would be if designed with similar minimalistic principles to the cardboard bed.
0: https://www.fastcompany.com/90962654/this-simple-design-turn...