Regulation doesn't have to be the answer though. The very same people talking out of both sides of their mouths here are the ones who can choose to just not invest in it.
Lock up the hardware in an offline facility and experiment there, if they really think it's important. Hell, even just skipping the double speak would be a big step. If they really aren't concerned with the risk then own it, don't tell me its risky while also releasing a new, more powerful version every 6-12 months.
We can argue that a lot of people have done pretty bad things using the internet, but should it have been regulated in advance?