That isn't the topic. Porn is an example, but safety is synonymous with puritanical requirements arbitrarily summed up as the lowest common denominator. I want a powerful AI, not a replacement of a priest.
Gemini demonstrated a product I do not want to use and I am aware about the requirements of corporate contexts, although I think the safety mechanisms should be in the hand of users.
Google optimized for advertisers, but I am not interested in such content as it provides little value.
Ok, but it seems very stupid to say you want the powerful AI to specifically come from a specific API when the very same tech is open sourced for any one to do whatever they want with
No large scale model maker is going to put out public models for B2B with dubious use cases.
what the problem is: OpenAI, facebook, Google are not curating the data sets. you're arguing they shouldn't put controls after the fact. but what you actually want is them to use quality datasets.
The models being open sourced makes them very easy to turn into the most deprived porno machines ever conceived. And they are.
It is in no way a meaningful barrier to what people can do. That’s the benefit of open source software.