Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

So is this "SDXL safe" or "SD2.1" safe, cause SDXL safe we can deal with, if it's 2.1 safe it's gonna end up DOA for a large part of the opensource community again



SD2.1 was not "overly safe", SD2.0 was because of a training bug.

2.1 didn't have adoption because people didn't want to deal with the open replacement for CLIP. Or possibly because everyone confused 2.0 and 2.1.


There was a replacement for CLIP? That is awesome. What was the issue with it?


Don't know about 3.0, but Cascade has different level of safety between the full model and the light model. Full model is far more prudish, but both completely fail with some prompts.


> SDXL safe we can deal with

how exactly did the community deal with it? interested to learn how to unlearn safety




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: