> There's no doubt that there's a benefit to the employee, but for corporations to adopt this there has to be a measurable benefit to the company as well.
This assumes that the company and employees must have adversarial priorities. This is only true if that’s how the company wants to be structured
Employee owned companies have no such adversarial structures
The fact that a large number, not all, of billion dollar companies are not employee owned, is not a proof that it’s the optimal way to run a company. It’s only optimal for Capital
In fact most companies are employee owned if for no other reason than they are small LLCs you don’t know the name of but are, for example, driving your FedEx packages around.
This assumes that the company and employees must have adversarial priorities. This is only true if that’s how the company wants to be structured
Employee owned companies have no such adversarial structures
The fact that a large number, not all, of billion dollar companies are not employee owned, is not a proof that it’s the optimal way to run a company. It’s only optimal for Capital
In fact most companies are employee owned if for no other reason than they are small LLCs you don’t know the name of but are, for example, driving your FedEx packages around.