You build a successful product that people love, gain an important position in a market you basically created, offer a closed marketplace for apps to further provide value to your core product, again this is a resounding success and people vote with their $$$ to subsidize your growth.
In the meantime, your competitor comes up with their own product and marketplace. Consumers are able to freely choose between both.
Now your company is forced by the gov to integrate your products with the competition's inferior marketplace. Why? How is this not overreach?
EDIT: easy to downvote, why don't you give me answers instead
It looks like the DOJ doesn't believe that the closed marketplace doesn't add value to consumers or businesses but only to Apple themselves.
I think the crux of the DOJs argument is that apple is using their dominate marketshare to rent seek and create artificial restrictions preventing competition with their own products.
You build a successful product that people love, gain an important position in a market you basically created, offer a closed marketplace for apps to further provide value to your core product, again this is a resounding success and people vote with their $$$ to subsidize your growth.
In the meantime, your competitor comes up with their own product and marketplace. Consumers are able to freely choose between both.
Now your company is forced by the gov to integrate your products with the competition's inferior marketplace. Why? How is this not overreach?
EDIT: easy to downvote, why don't you give me answers instead