Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

A reply is always in the context of the thing that is being replied on. It’s how replies work…

If there is an article about berries and you say you love blueberries and I reply saying “I hate them”, it in the context of blueberries. It doesn’t mean I hate all berries. And I shouldn’t have to clarify that, since I’m replying to a comment about blueberries.

How else could this work?




And everything is always in exactly one easily defined context, right? So for a comment reply we already know the full context just by looking at its immediate parent. That's how nested replies work, right?


Yes..?


Really? Go into the next HN thread and see how many deeply nested comments you can make sense of by looking only at their parent.


You are not doing HN right if you are only reading the parent


Correct. Why is that? Apply this logic to the current comment chain, starting from OP.


Yeah, you both seem to agree. The larger context matters.


Me:

> And everything is always in exactly one easily defined context, right? So for a comment reply we already know the full context just by looking at its immediate parent. That's how nested replies work, right?

noncoml:

> Yes..?

But somehow, also noncoml:

> You are not doing HN right if you are only reading the parent

I give up.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2025 batch! Applications are open till May 13

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: