> acts of espionage Are you claiming that stuxnet is not an act of espionage... | Hacker News

Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

login

pyre on June 1, 2012 | parent | context | favorite | on: US and Israel created Stuxnet, lost control of it

  > acts of espionage

Are you claiming that stuxnet is not an act of espionage?

  > Indirect means indirect

By your definition, embargoes are 'direct' because they are not levied against proxy nations.

wissler on June 2, 2012 [–]

Stuxnet was very clearly sabotage. I can't believe the herd here. Downvote away.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact