Probably not. Arresting disagreeing judges would be a violation of due process, ... | Hacker News

Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

login

legitster 10 months ago | parent | context | favorite | on: Supreme Court rules ex-presidents have immunity fo...

Probably not. Arresting disagreeing judges would be a violation of due process, as is murdering US citizens without a trial.

At least that was the tentative conclusion last time this was brought up: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/feb/22/obama-...

spacemanspiff01 10 months ago [–]

It might be a violation of the law and clearly illegal, but that does not mean it is not an official act for which the president is immune.

Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!
Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact