You have made an entirely valid argument, and I really appreciate the reply. This is the law of the land.
Now that the courts will have to do some of the work that was previously done by agencies, has the budget for the judicial branch been increased? If not, are we about to hit a major backlog which leads to less progress in the private sector?
Are there any estimates on how many new judges must be sworn in, and new clerks need to be hired?
It's not yet obvious how many more cases there will be. There probably will be more initially as people want to challenge things they previously didn't expect to be able to win because the courts would have deferred to the agency. But you also eliminate all the cases where an agency would change their interpretation, get sued, change it back, get sued by someone else, etc. Once the courts have established a precedent for that rule, there should be less flip flopping and consequently less litigation.
Now that the courts will have to do some of the work that was previously done by agencies, has the budget for the judicial branch been increased? If not, are we about to hit a major backlog which leads to less progress in the private sector?
Are there any estimates on how many new judges must be sworn in, and new clerks need to be hired?