Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

A small fraction of the time, private equity is brought in to make an ailing, breakeven business profitable.

Much more often, it's to bite off limbs until it dies, feasting on cashflow and assets.

And then the third portion of the time, the business is generating reliable, modest long-term returns, a "blue-chip" company. Private equity doubles down on future growth that is not projected, gets the company into debt to the owners, makes it worthless, compensate themselves in stock with bank leverage, issues themselves further priority stock, files bankruptcy to get rid of the pensions, and on, and on, and on with various tricks to sack whatever assets the have on their books and whatever cashflow was generating a reliable 5% return before private equity got involved.




> Much more often, it's to bite off limbs until it dies, feasting on cashflow and assets

This can be a legitimate strategy. I know someone who made millions buying yellow pages companies and managing them for de-growth.


Eastman Kodak is a good example. Fujifilm arguably sort of came out the other side but much smaller company in much different country.

B&M retail, especially in the traditional department store sense, is much reduced. Could Sears have become Amazon (presumably including AWS)? I guess. Would anyone to a first approximation who was employed at Sears still be there? Probably not. Would Sears as it existed have brought any particular assets or expertise to the table? Probably not.

At some point, reinvention is sort of pointless because it means bringing along a lot of baggage that has net negative value.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: