> They can perfectly recall, process and copy all information they’re exposed to.
I'm not sure if it's better or worse that the computers can do that while the AI running on them get confused and mix things up.
> And they don’t have a self preservation instict like people with bodies do.
Not so sure about that, self preservation is an instrumental goal for almost anything else. Even a system that doesn't have any self-awareness, but is subject to a genetic algorithm, would probably end up with that behaviour.
If we are still talking about AI enhanced companies, it's not that companies evolve. It's that those companies who are unfit, die off. Paul Graham put it humorously in a very old speech I can't find...
I was responding to (what I thought was) a point about AI themselves rather than specifically attached to corporations.
Corporations (and bureaucracies) don't follow the same maths as evolution — although they do mutate, merge, split, share memes, etc., the difference is that "success" isn't measured in number of descendants.
But even then, organisations that last, generally have their own survival encoded into their structure, which may or may not look like any particular individual within also wanting the organisation to continue.
I'm not sure if it's better or worse that the computers can do that while the AI running on them get confused and mix things up.
> And they don’t have a self preservation instict like people with bodies do.
Not so sure about that, self preservation is an instrumental goal for almost anything else. Even a system that doesn't have any self-awareness, but is subject to a genetic algorithm, would probably end up with that behaviour.