Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Personally, and I need to read more, is that ethically the problem lies with sharing. Is Matt/automattic ethically obliged due compensation? I think not. WP Engine is its own company like automattic. Would it grace WPE if they do compensate with money or resources? Obviously, but then you might also want to put them in the foundation oversee committee if they do half of the work.

The law, I have no idea in what direction this is going to go!




> Is Matt/automattic ethically obliged due compensation?

This question here goes straight to the heart of things.

WP.org is a 501(c)3 organization. Ostensibly, it has absolutely nothing to do with Automattic. Reality... appears to be somewhat different.

If there were compensation due, it would not be to Automattic.

WP.org has a board of directors, not a dictator. Ostensibly, Matt is the Chairman. Why would he be due compensation?

The fact that such questions even arise shows just how ... murky ... Matt/WP.org/WP.com/Automattic's interactions are.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: