Intrinsic to the article is, arguably, a significant cause of fraud in this field: The article talks about fraud as if it's done by the 'other' - by someone else, other than the article's author (or their audience).
The solution starts when you say, 'we committed fraud - our field, our publication, the scientific enterprise. What are we going to do?'
Does the author really have no idea about these things? That they occur?
The solution starts when you say, 'we committed fraud - our field, our publication, the scientific enterprise. What are we going to do?'
Does the author really have no idea about these things? That they occur?