Not all of that writing is relevant or useful in analysis. In particular, writing an article that contains a worry that people are "hating on the wrong part of Altman," is a bit of a giveaway that the author lacks the ability to a deep technical analysis of the problem and has instead decided to focus on personality.
Altman isn't a deep technical problem to be solved.
flood management is a deep technical problem
Energy policy is a deep technical problem
Altman is a dude whos wildly rich, in charge of a darling company, and having the same smoke blown up his arse as the other silicon valley darlings. Like Musk, he's deeply predictable.
What he does next depends on how much money he thinks he can burn in the next year.
He will lobby for extension of copyright for fair use (or similar).
He will lobby against any kind of data protections law (that fucks up the training pipeline)
> Altman isn't a deep technical problem to be solved.
He's running a company that has created one.
> What he does next depends on how much money he thinks he can burn in the next year.
Which is why personality analysis is entirely the wrong tool here. It offers you absolutely zero predictions. Why you would double down on this is beyond me.
> Which is why personality analysis is entirely the wrong tool here
I mean its not really. What is his attitude to risk, how well does he understand people's motivations? what narrative is he selling his investors? what is he aiming for? what's his personal goal?
All of this shape the outcome of the company, and those are dependent on his personality.
In the same way that Musk is short sighted and thin skinned, means that twitter is the way it is. Zuck is happy to burn billions so long as the research looks promising. Bezos is all about market share.
