He inspired the harassment. It was obvious to everyone, Jones included, that his actions were resulting in grieving parents being harassed and he did not change his actions. At some point people should be held responsible for the actions they know they are inspiring in others.
> Funny how quick "he harassed them" turns into "he inspired the harassment"
Yes, it's called a "clarification". OP misspoke, I clarified. If there are any other language features we can expand upon in this thread now is as good a time as any, I suppose.
> for which there is no legal precedent anywhere, ever.
May I introduce you to the concept of "incitement"? Not on the law books in Texas so Jones wasn't tried for it but let's not pretend it doesn't exist as a concept "anywhere, ever".
"Someone harassed someone" and "someone else drew inspiration to harass someone from remarks" are wildly different things.
"hurr durr someone misspoke", lol no -- those are wildly different thing and someone just got called out for posting total horse shit.
> May I introduce you to the concept of "incitement"?
Show me a single video clip where a sane and sober person could construe one of Alex's remarks to be "incitement". Pro tip: you CAN'T. We already know you fucking can't.
