Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

That's basically my experience. It's great for learning or getting things done when the subject is related to one you know well (i.e. you understand the fundamentals and can verify responses quickly).

It's not so good for a completely new subject, or one you have a lot of experience in.




They're not useful when you're completely new to a subject? On the contrary, I've found that they are excellent when you have limited knowledge in a ___domain and less useful when you have expertise. They have allowed me to go from zero to functioning MVP on numerous computer vision projects, even though I have zero experience.


Do you have programming experience? I probably didn't explain well, what I meant is that if you have zero relevant experience it can be difficult to verify correctness.

For example, I'm comfortable with frontend development but hadn't used webworkers or websockets. ChatGPT was useful for getting up to speed quickly. I've had less luck with topics that are completely new to me, one example is coming up with a training regimen for long distance running. I have to manually verify every little thing, which ends up taking longer than doing research the old fashioned way.

I'd be surprised if you could go from zero to a useful CV app with LLMs, but it's possible I just haven't given it a fair shake.


Exactly. They are good in the sweet spot when you can verify that they are correct, but you are not that good to do it yourself.

Basically StackOverflow but without the annoying mods?




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2025 batch! Applications are open till May 13

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: